Just why do you think the THB added looks better in the analyzer templates than mine that actually has the analyzation? Sure they're animated, but they're small and blurry. Come on please unblock me! I haven't on there that long. You gotta let me back in, I got new pictures to add. I beg of you.
P.S. You deleted this photo, it's great for magnadramon it's the only one in
Wow I am super-sorry about being late on that. I don't usually visit wikis with the notifications thing, and I honestly haven't been here in ages. Um, sounds fine to me for what my meager opinion is worth.
The MegaMan Knowledge Base is formally invited to join the Wikia Gaming Alliance.
The Wikia Gaming Alliance (WGA) is an alliance created by wikis hosted on Wikia. It is an alliance where each wiki helps each other out when help is needed. It also helps to connect the gaming wikis of Wikia to create an easier experience for readers.Wikis in the WGA will:
Be able to get help from other gaming wikis through the WGA Forums.
Be featured on the WGA Footer, which is located on the mainpage of all WGA members.
If the MegaMan Knowledge Base is interested in joining the Wikia Gaming Alliance, then an admin should post a topic for the wiki (here) and include a filled out registration form, which is located here.
For more information on the Wikia Gaming Alliance, please check out the Wikia Gaming Alliance's website.
Note: The WGA is not officially endorsed by Wikia, it is just an alliance formed by wikis on Wikia.
I show no user with that name on the wiki, and none in the block logs. You may have been blocked because you share an IP with someone who vandalized the wiki, but you should be able to solve that by accessing the wiki using your account.
I've got no idea. I don't know what your IP is, so you'd need to check it yourself on your PC, then compare it against our block logs.
If you are being blocked because you share an IP address with a vandal, then you should be able to keep editing by using your signed-in account. If that doesn't work, contact wikia to inquire if there's a bug.
I do not intend any disrespect but over the previous 48+hrs, I investigated and found the "vandal" you referred to.
You stated the following:
"You had fifteen hours, don't make up bullshit about not having time. One hour after I added my corrections, you reverted all of G-SANtos and mine MANDATORY corrections, without making any further improvements."
"You were warned not to do this before now, you were warned tonight, and you continue to do it. If you were just disagreeing about content, that would be one thing, but you're actually ripping up the coding and reintroducing uncontroversial spelling and grammar corrections. You are being a complete detriment to this wiki, and you have shown no inclination to work with others at all."
"You have been permanently banned from this wiki. If you wish to edit here again, you need to show that you will actually follow wiki policy.":
to User: Jdogno7. "Jdog" has given me an explanation for why the significant time lapse between edits has occurred. Due to having been blocked without a chance to explain further, has requested that I present the username's case on the username's own behalf.
The first point he/she wishes to put across is that: If he/she is right to presume that you are in the United States of America and that is where the Server for the wikia is also located, unfortunately that is not where the username resides. The username is from Australia. While it was 7:00 AM for you at the time of the incident of dispute, it was 9:00 pm for them. As a result of long term mental and emotional stress (which in turn caused physical stress) , they were tired at such a time and therefore retired to rest for the night.
So, having explained the background of what was occurring for the username at that timepoint, the rest of the details can be further explained with, hopefully, little confusion as possible. They would have slept for at least the next six-eight hours. This would have left only seven-nine hours out of the possible fifteen hours.
However as the username's sleep cycle was increased to an excessive level as a result of mental+ emotional stress, it was far longer than the healthy and natural 6-8 hours. But say they had got up at 6:00am, they would have had breakfast and done their morning rituals which would have taken them to 9:00am.
However, they did not get up early and only got up at 9 am. This would have left at most 4-6 hours max out of 15 (Note: the remaining time during this point in the given calculation would at most be 40% of the "fifteen hour period") hours.
However, due to obligations (of the academic sort) of the User, it took them to 10 am to be able to sit down to continue editing, which left only 3-5 hours out of the "15" hours (Note: 1/5 (20%)-1/3 (33%) of the "15" hours at this point in the calculation).
However at most, they were only able to do any editing in the space of 2 hours after which they were blocked.
Give or take 1-3 hours as a result of health issues, the user at most had 6 hours (40% of the 15 hour period) to do anything and not 15 hours. However due to health problems they only had at most 3 hours (20% of the time) to do anything.
Therefore Username Jdogno7 feels as though he/she has been given an overly harsh response including being blocked.
...oh, you're sockpuppeting. I didn't check closely enough earlier.
1) As always, your userpage on the wiki remains unlocked. That is the correct place to air disagreements with the block.
2) You were blocked because you consistently undid maintenance admin edits wholesale on the flimsy pretext that you "weren't done with the article yet", and were warned over a period of months that this absolutely counted as vandalism and would not be tolerated.
You're behavior above is only further proof that you have no intention to act honestly or cease the vandalism that got you banned. Your ban is upheld.
NO! I WAS NOT SOCKPUPPETING! My FRIEND ALLOWED ME to use THEIR USENAME so I COULD APPEAL!
Even, if my userpage remained unlocked: How would leaving a message on my own talkpage get anyone's attention if it was necessary?
"Flimsy pretext": that was the god-dam-bloody-hell TRUTH!
You refer to "admin edits": so does that mean that the admins are incontrovertibly correct absolutely?
"WARNED OVER A PERIOD OF MONTHS"!: What an ABSURD, PREPOSTEROUS, LUDICROUS, RIDICULOUS, NONSENCE, BULLSHIT LIE! Most of the time, when you reverted my edits, you did so without an explanation and couldn't be bothered to give one when I asked. Notable examples would be with the Xros Heart army page, the articles concerning Digimon World Data Squad characters and lastly Knightmon's article.
I find it ironic that you use the word "tolerated" considering your high level of impatience and intolerance for others with different opinions to yourself.
You say, I don't understand grammar: at least I know that it is improper English to say: "You're behavior above is..." instead of "YOUR behavior above is...".
"...HAVE NO INENTION TO ACT HONESTLY..."!: I had to appeal the way I did because you blocked me on Digimon wikia before I could give a reply to your very last response.
To quote Skips: "I've seen this before". While it's the first time this has happened here, there will be some asshole or spambot who arrives at a random wiki and starts spamming up the place to get attention. I thank you for not actually trying to talk to them since they do it for attention. I suspect they do it because either don't like/hate the wiki, are trying to spite one or more than one person in particular who runs and/or moderates the site or are just doing it for attention. I remember one person in particular who was a total nutcase at the Inuyasha wiki. He didn't upload any pictures, but he filled existing articles and basically the wiki as a whole with his nutty obsession with Kagome and he tried taking over other wikis as well but he was stopped, eventually.